Bombay High CourtMCA/848/2017disposed of

Suraj Ramesh Betkikar., v. Manjila Santosh Vernekar And 27 ORS.,

2017-12-14Deputy Registrar1 pages

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

APPELLATE SIDE MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 848 OF 2017 SURAJ RAMESH BETKIKAR., ... Petitioner

Versus

MANJILA SANTOSH VERNEKAR AND 27 ORS., ... Respondent Adv. Shri Sarvesh P.Naik for the Petitioner.

REGISTRAR'S ORDER Notices were sent to the Respondents before admission. From the Bailiff report dated 01/06/2017 reveals that the Respondent Nos. 3, 5, 6, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17, 21, 22 to 25 are not residing on the given addresses "They have left address" . According to the Petitioner it was the last known address/s. Fresh notices if issued, will not be served upon them by ordinary mode.

Hence, issue notice to them by way of substituted service under Order V Rule 20 of CPC, by publishing their notices alongwith the order of ad-interim relief in the two local newspapers, i.e. one in English and Marathi, widely circulated in the State of Goa. Date: 14th December, 2017 ( Kiran A. Bagi ) Registrar(Judicial) sk