Shailesh Narayan Vernekar., v. State Of Goa, Thr. Its Chief Secretary And 3 ORS.,

vinita 1 WP 621-17 dt -4.10.18 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 36 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 621 OF 2017.

Shailesh Narayan Vernekar, ...

Applicant.

Versus

State of Goa and 3 others.

...

Respondents.

Mr. P.

Talaulikar and Mr. J. Simoes, Advocates for the Applicant. Ms. N. Kholkar, Additional Government Advocate for Respondent no.1.

Ms. R. Pereira, Advocate for Respondent nos.2 and 3. Mr. C. A. Coutinho, Advocate for Respondent no.4. Coram : N.M. Jamdar & Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ.

Date : 4 October 2018.

P.C.:

The Respondents point out that pursuant to the impugned order dated 25 February 2016 an entry has already been carried out. 2.

It is settled position that such entries, which are meant for fiscal purpose, confer no title and the question of title has to be adjudicated in the Civil Court. We are informed that parties are already in Civil Court in respect of their substantive rights. Therefore, even if an entry is carried out pursuant to the impugned

vinita 2 WP 621-17 dt -4.10.18 order, as far as substantive rights of the parties are concerned, it will have no effect whatsoever.

3.

Civil Application stands disposed of.

Prithviraj K. Chavan, J. N.M. Jamdar, J.