← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/829/2019disposed of

Gautam Ramanbhai Patel., v. Lume John Fernandes @ Lume John Vincent Fernandes And ANR.,

2023-02-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Sonak2 pages

7-WP-829,831,830 OF 2019.DOC Suchitra

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

WRIT PETITION NO.829/2019 GAUTAM RAMANBHAI PATEL ... PETITIONER

Versus

LUME JOHN FERNANDES @ LUME JOHN VINCENT FERNANDES & ANR.

... RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION NO.831/2019 GAUTAM RAMANBHAI PATEL AND ANR. ... PETITIONERS

Versus

FERNANDES RESLTORS PVT.

LTD. REP. BY ITS MAN. DIRECTOR, LUME JOAO VINCENT FERNANDES & 3 ORS. ... RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION NO.830/2019 GAUTAM RAMANBHAI PATEL ... PETITIONER

Versus

ANSELMO D'SOUZA & ANR. ... RESPONDENT Mr K. Padgaonkar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr Raunaq Rao, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Mr B. Pacheco, Advocate for the Respondent No.4(A). 22nd February 2023

7-WP-829,831,830 OF 2019.DOC

CORAM:

M. S. SONAK, J.

DATED:

22nd February 2023 P.C.:

1.

Mr K. Padgaonkar, learned counsel for the petitioners, based on the instructions from the petitioners, seeks leave to withdraw these petitions because the main suit in which the impugned order was made has itself been disposed of as withdrawn.

2.

Accordingly, all these petitions are disposed of. 3.

Mr Padgaonkar places on record written applications signed by the petitioner-Mr Gautam Ramanbhai Patel craving leave to withdraw the writ petitions. Accordingly, the applications are taken on record and based on them, coupled with the request of Mr Padgaonkar, the petitions are disposed of. M. S. SONAK, J.

SUCHITRA NANDAN SINGBAL SUCHITRA NANDAN SINGBAL Date: 2023.02.23 10:52:55 +05'30'

22nd February 2023