Bombay High CourtCP/37/2011disposed of

Shambhu A Pai Panandiker And 5 ORS., v. Marpol Private Limited And 22 ORS.,

2018-08-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice C. V. Bhadang2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 37 OF 2011 IN COMPANY APPEAL NO. 3 OF 2011 SHAMBHU A PAI PANANDIKER AND 5 ORS., ... Petitioners

Versus

MARPOL PRIVATE LIMITED AND 22 ORS., ... Respondents Shri Parag Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Coram:- C. V. BHADANG, J.

Date:- 31st August 2018 P.C.

Heard Shri Rao, the learned Counsel for the petitioner.

2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has placed on record a copy of the e-mail dated 24.08.2018 from the petitioner. The copy is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. Shri Rao, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, states that all the disputes between the parties relating to the Company, M/s Marpol Private Limited have been settled and therefore, the petitioner does not intend to continue with the contempt petition. It is submitted that the Company, M/s Marpol Private Limited is a closely held Company. The petitioner and the respondent no. 2, against whom the allegations of contempt of Court was made,

CP/37/2011 are real brothers.

3. The record in the present case does not show that any notice in Form I, under Rule 9 of the Contempt of Courts (Bombay High Court) Rules, 1994, was issued to the respondent no. 2. In that view of the matter and as the parties have settled all their disputes amicably and the petitioner does not intend to prosecute the contempt petition, the same is dismissed. C. V. BHADANG, J.