Subhash Bhisso Naik And ANR., v. Antonio Jawaharlal Pimenta (Dec) And 6 ORS.,

26-MCA-51-2020..DOC Vinita

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA.

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 51 OF 2020 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 36 OF 2016.

SUBHASH BHISSO NAIK AND ANR., VS ANTONIO JAWAHARLAL PIMENTA (DEC) AND 6 ...Applicants.

...Respondents.

Mr. I. Santimano, Advocate for the applicants. Ms. R. Banaulikar, Advocate holding for Mr. V.Menezes, Adoate for the respondent nos.2(A and B).

Ms. S. Shaikh, Advocate for the respondent nos.3 and 4.

CORAM:

SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.

DATE:

12th July, 2022.

P.C.:

1.

By this application, the applicants seek to serve respondent nos. 2(c), 2(d), and 5 by substitute service by affixation and also seeks leave to drop and delete respondent no. 7.

2.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicants. Perused the bailiff report.

3.

In view of the bailiff's report, the applicants are permitted to serve respondent no.2(c), 2(d), and 5 by

26-MCA-51-2020..DOC substitute service by affixation.

4.

In view of the averments in paragraph 5, the applicants are permitted to drop respondent no.7 from the appeal proceeding. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.

5.

Application is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. SANDEEP K. SHINDE,J.

VINITA VIKAS NAIK Date: 2022.07.12 18:28:58 +05'30'