Madhav Raya Bhat @ Madeu Raia Botto, Rep. By Const. Att., Rohidassa Madhau Bhat And 3 ORS., v. Raghunath Prabhu And 14 ORS.,

4-MCA-164-2020.DOC Suchitra

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.164/2020 IN STAMP NUMBER (MAIN) NO.3479/2019 (F) MADHAV RAYA BHAT @ MADEU RAIA BOTTO, REP. BY CONST. ATT., ROHIDASSA MADHAU BHAT AND 3 ORS.

... APPLICANTS

Versus

RAGHUNATH PRABHU & 14 ORS.

... RESPONDENTS Mr D. Vernekar Advocate for the Applicants.

Mr Gaurish Agni with Mr Kishan Kavlekar, Advocates for Respondents No.1 to 10, 12 and 13.

Mr Sahil Sardessai, Advocate for Respondents No.14 & 15.

CORAM:

M. S. SONAK, J.

DATED:

24th March 2023 P.C.:

1.

Mr D. Vernekar, seeks deletion of respondent no.11 on the ground that she is not a necessary party. At the risk and consequences of the petitioner leave is granted. Necessary amendment to be carried out forthwith.

2.

Mr Sahil Sardessai appears for respondents no.14 and 15 and Mr Agni appears for respondents no.1 to 10, 12 and 13. 24th March 2023

4-MCA-164-2020.DOC 3.

Considering the cause shown in the civil application and the fact that the delay is of only 25 days, the same is condoned. Cause is shown in paragraphs 6 to 17 of the application. The application is also backed by medical case papers from the Goa Medical College and Hospital and Manipal Hospital. 4.

Civil application is allowed and disposed of. M. S. SONAK, J.

SUCHITRA NANDAN SINGBAL SUCHITRA NANDAN SINGBAL Date: 2023.03.27 16:06:11 +05'30'

24th March 2023