Anand Chandru Naik., v. Kapil Shirgaonkar And 2 ORS.,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 37 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 731 OF 2018 ANAND CHANDRU NAIK., ... Petitioner

Versus

KAPIL SHIRGAONKAR AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents Mr. Ashwin D. Bhobe, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. D. Pangam, Advocate General along with Mr. A. Talaulikar, Addl. Government Advocate for the State.

Coram:- M. S. SONAK & C. V. BHADANG, JJ.

Date:- 2nd December, 2019 P.C.:

Heard Mr. A. D. Bhobe for the petitioner. Mr. D. Pangam, learned Advocate General appears in this matter along with Mr. A. Talaulikar, learned Additional Government Advocate.

2. Learned Advocate General makes a statement that the competent authority will take a final decision in this matter within eight weeks from today positively.

3. In view of the aforesaid statement, we do not deem it appropriate to exercise our contempt jurisdiction on this occasion.

CP/37/2019

4. By accepting the aforesaid statement, we dispose of this Contempt Petition.

C. V. BHADANG, J.

M. S. SONAK, J.

ss