The Goa Forest Development Corporation Ltd. And ANR., v. Pramod Pandurang Timblo.,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 93 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 20 OF 2014 THE GOA FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR., ... Applicants

Versus

PRAMOD PANDURANG TIMBLO., ... Respondent Ms. Susan Linhares, Additional Government Advocate for the applicants.

Shri G. Panandikar, Advocate for the respondent Nos.1a, 1b and 1c.

Coram:- NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.

Date:- 2nd December, 2019 P.C.:

Shri G. Panandikar, learned Advocate submits that he has instructions to appear on behalf of the respondent nos.1a, 1b and 1c. None again for the respondent nos.1d to 1f.

2. Shri G. Panandikar, learned Advocate has no objection to the application for the condonation of delay.

3. The respondent nos.1d to 1f have constantly remained absent. In view thereof, the delay in bringing the legal representatives of the deceased respondent on record is condoned. The applicants to carry out the necessary corrections in the cause title within two weeks from today.

MCA/93/2019

4. Accordingly, the application stands disposed off. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.

mv