Atul Prakash Naik., v. Jagdish Walekar And 2 ORS.,

206-FA-111-17.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

FIRST APPEAL NO. 111 OF 2017 WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 726 OF 2017 ATUL PRAKASH NAIK.

....APPELLANT/ APPLICANT.

Versus.

JAGDISH WALEKAR AND 2 ORS.

....RESPONDENTS.

Mr Jeevan Bandekar, for the Appellant-Applicant. Mr Sanman R. Keny, Advocate under Legal Aid Scheme for Respondent No.1.

Mr Vishwadh Sardessai, Advocate under Legal Aid Scheme for Respondent No.2.

Mr Amey Kakodkar, Advocate for Respondent No.5. CORAM :

M. S. SONAK, J.

DATE :

th September 2022 P.C. : - 1.

Mr Jeevan Bandekar today appears for the Appellant. On instructions from the Appellant, he states that the Appellant wishes to withdraw this Appeal. Accordingly, Mr Bandekar prays for a leave to withdraw this Appeal.

2.

Leave, as prayed for, is granted and the Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

30th September 2022

206-FA-111-17.DOC 3.

Misc. Civil Applications, if any, do not survive the disposal of the Appeal and the same are also disposed of. 4.

The amount of 25,000/-, deposited by the Appellant, can ₹ now be withdrawn by the Respondent-Claimant. This permission was already granted vide order dated 11 th August, 2022.

5.

The Goa State Legal Services Authority (GSLSA) should ensure that Mr Keny is paid his fees in terms of the Rules. His fees are in addition to the gratitude which this Court expresses to Mr Keny for appearing in this matter. The GSLSA must now ensure that at least this amount of 25,000/- reaches the ₹ SANTOSH S MHAMAL Respondent-Claimant, at the earliest.

SANTOSH S MHAMAL Date: 2022.09.30 16:52:05 +05'30'

6.

A copy of this order to be furnished to the Member Secretary, GSLSA for compliance.

M. S. SONAK, J.

30th September 2022