Sujata Sadanand Naik And 7 ORS., v. Rohidas H. Naik Shirodkar (Dec) Thr. Lrs. And 16 ORS.,
CA 68 of 2017 Niti
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.68 OF 2017 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.45 OF 2017 SUJATA SADANAND NAIK AND 7 ORS., ... APPLICANTS
Versus
ROHIDAS H. NAIK SHIRODKAR (DEC) THR. LRS. AND 16 ORS., ... RESPONDENTS Mr Parikshit Sawant, Advocate for the Applicants. Ms A. Fernandes, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 & 3. CORAM:- M. S. SONAK, J.
DATED :- 31st August, 2023 P.C.:
Mr Sawant states that the present Civil Application is not pressed because till now no application has been made for mutation. He submits that as and when such application is made by the Decree Holders for mutation liberty may be granted to seek interim relief.
2. Accordingly, this Civil Application is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.
M. S. SONAK, J.
K HALDANKAR Date: 2023.08.31 15:06:49 +05'30'
NITI K HALDANKAR 31st August, 2023