← Library
Bombay High CourtCRA/36/2017disposed of

The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panaji., v. Andrew Telecommunication Ltd.,

2017-11-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. M. Jamdar1 pages

CRA36-17 dt24-11-17 Amrut IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.36 OF 2017 The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Panaji Goa.

.... Applicant

Versus

Andrew Telecommunication Pvt. Ltd.

.... Respondent Ms. A. Razaq, Advocate for the Applicant.

Ms. Priyanka Kamat, Advocate for the respondent. Coram : N.M. Jamdar, J.

Date : 24 November 2017.

P.C.:

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Perused the application. Sufficient cause is made out. Subject to the removal of the office objections within a period of two weeks from today, the Civil Revision Application is allowed. The order by the learned Registrar ( Judicial ) dismissing the Tax Appeal is set aside and the appeal stands restored to file. If the office objections are not removed within a period of two weeks as above then the order passed by the learned Registrar dismissing the appeal will stand revived.

N.M. Jamdar, J.