Radhakrisna Shet., v. Vithal Krishna Parab And 5 ORS.,

SA 72 of 2019 Amrut

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

SECOND APPEAL NO.72 OF 2019 RADHAKRISNA SHET., ... APPELLANT

Versus

VITHAL KRISHNA PARAB AND 5 ORS., ... RESPONDENTS Mr Vithal Naik, Advocate for respondent No.6. CORAM:- BHARATI DANGRE, J.

DATED :- 25th April, 2025 P.C.:

Not on board. Taken on board.

2. This is a praecipe for speaking to the minutes of the judgment and order dated 21.03.2025 passed by this Court in Second Appeal No.72 of 2019.

3. Mr Naik, the learned counsel for respondent No.6 pointed out that the name and details of respondent No.6 as stated in the cause title of the appeal memo remained to be incorporated in the cause title of the judgment and order dated 21.03.2025. Accordingly, the necessary corrections be carried out in the original judgment and order dated 21.03.2025, by inserting the following in the cause title and the corrected judgment and order be uploaded on the website. 25th April, 2025

SA 72 of 2019 "6. Santosh Parab, Father's name not known, Age not known, married Resident of Madapai, Marcel, Ponda Goa."

BHARATI DANGRE, J.

Signed by: AMRUT NAGESH TARI Designation: Personal Assistant Date: 25/04/2025 19:30:54 25th April, 2025