← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1166/2016rule made absolute

Mrs. Maria Brazinha Fernandes., v. State Bank Of India, Thr. Its Branch Manager And 3 ORS.,

2017-02-08F. M. Reis,Hon'Ble Kum. Justice Nutan D. Sardessai3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

WRIT PETITION NO.1166 OF 2016 Mrs. Maria Brazinha Fernandes wife of late Shri Antonio Joao Jose Marcel Fernandes, Aged 71 years, R/o. H.No.603, Nr. St. Sebastian Chappel, Dongrim, Majorda, Salcete, Goa.

.... Petitioner V/s State Bank of India, A Bank constituted under the State Bank of India Act, 1966 Having its Head Office at Madam Cama Road, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400-021 And having its branch office at 1st Floor, SBLC Building, Patto Plaza, Panaji, Goa 403001, Through its Branch Manager.

Mrs. Virginia Lourenco, wife of Mr. Michael Lourenco, Major of age (age not known) R/o. H.No.108, Nr. Carambolim Church, Pether Carambolim, Tiswadi, Goa.

State of Goa, Through the Chief Secretary, Having office at Secretariat, Porvorim, Goa.

Additional District Magistrate,

South Goa District, Margao, Margao-Goa.

... Respondents Shri G. Agni, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Shri I. Agha, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

Ms. Priyanka Kamat, Additional Government Advocate for Respondents No.3 & 4.

Coram:- F. M. REIS & NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.

Date : 8th February, 2017 JUDGMENT : (Per F.M. REIS, J.) Heard Shri G. Agni, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, Shri I. Agha, the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent no.1 and Ms. P. Kamat, the learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondents no.3 & 4.

2.

Rule. Heard forthwith with the consent of the learned Counsel. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents waive service. 3.

After hearing the matter for some time, the following order is passed by consent:

(i) The impugned order passed under Section 14(1) of the Securitisation And Reconstruction of Financial Assets And Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act, for short) dated 23/06/2005 shall not

bind only the parties to such proceedings.

(ii) The respondent no.1 is at liberty to proceed to take action against the petitioner and others in respect of the subject loan in terms of the provision of the said SARFAESI Act in accordance with law.

(iii) The petitioner shall furnish the names of all the legal representatives of the deceased Antonio Jaoa Jose Marcelo Fernandes within one week from today. (iv) Needless to say the impugned order shall operate against other persons in accordance with law. (v) Rule is made absolute in the above terms with no order as to costs.

NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.

F.M.REIS, J.

NH