Sunita Vithal Naik (Expired) Rep. Thr. Defendant No. 3 And 5. And 8 ORS., v. Audhut Gajanan Kamat And 3 ORS.,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6 OF 2017 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 9 OF 2017 SUNITA VITHAL NAIK (EXPIRED) REP.

THR. DEFENDANT NO. 3 AND 5. AND 8 ORS., ... Applicants

Versus

AUDHUT GAJANAN KAMAT AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents Shri Akshay Shirodkar, Advocate for the Applicants. Shri Parag S. Rao, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Shri Prayash Shirodkar, Advocate for Respondent No. 4. Coram:- C. V. BHADANG, J.

Date:- 30th July 2018 P.C.

This is an application for stay of the impugned judgment and decree, pertaining to the demolition of the suit structure. Indisputably, there was an interim stay operating, during the pendency of the First Appeal. In that view of the matter and further having regard to the fact that the Second Appeal is Admitted, the present application is allowed, in terms of prayer clause (a).

2. Liberty to the parties to move for early hearing.

CA/6/2017

3. The Civil Application is disposed of.

C. V. BHADANG, J.

EV