Narhari Parab., v. Premila Sankolkar Alias Sanjana Kudav And 3 ORS.,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 1180 OF 2018 NARHARI PARAB., ... Petitioner
Versus
PREMILA SANKOLKAR ALIAS SANJANA KUDAV AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents Shri Shirin V. Naik, Advocate for the Petitioner. Coram:- C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date:- 12th December 2018 P.C.:
On hearing the learned Counsel for the petitioner, I do not find that any case for interference is made out. The petitioner is yet to open his evidence and it would be open to the petitioner to lead his own evidence and to produce the documents, as he may decide in support of his defence. The learned Tribunal, in my considered view, is right in holding that if at all, according to the petitioner the statement of DW-1 in his cross examination is incorrect, it is for the petitioner to satisfy the Tribunal. In that view of the matter, the petition is disposed of. C. V. BHADANG, J.
EV