The State Of Maharashtra v. Tanaji Shripati Jadhav And ANR

ssm 1 20-appln654.17.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 654 OF 2017 The State of Maharashtra .....Applicant Vs.

Tanaji Shripati Jadhav & Anr.

....Respondents.

Ms. P.P. Shinde, APP for the Applicant.

Mr. Chetan Gajanan Patil for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : A. S. OKA, AND A. S. GADKARI, JJ.

DATE : 18th FEBRUARY, 2019.

P.C.:­ Heard the learned APP for the Applicant. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents opposes the prayer. There is a sufficient cause to condone the delay of 38 days. Hence, the rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (b). (A.S. GADKARI, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.) 1/1