← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/203/2022disposed off

Vijaykumar Revansidha Keskar v. Sitaram Kunthe, Chief Secretary State Of Maharashtra

2022-08-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.V. Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar2 pages

Pallavi 56-cp-203-2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.203 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1414 OF 2021 Vijaykumar Revansidha Keskar ...

Petitioner V/s.

Sitaram Kunthe and Ors.

... Contemnors Nos.1 to 3 In the matter between Vijaykumar Revansidha Keskar ...

Petitioner V/s.

The Chief Secretary and Ors.

...

Respondents ------------------- by PALLAVI MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR Date:

2022.08.30 12:16:53 +0530 PALLAVI MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR Mr. Kuldeep U. Nikam, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. N.C. Walimbe, AGP for the Respondent - State. --------------------- CORAM :

S.V. GANGAPURWALA & MADHAV J. JAMDAR, JJ.

DATED : 29th AUGUST 2022 P.C. :

1.

We have heard the learned Advocate for the Petitioner and the learned AGP for the Respondent - State. The Petitioner alleges contempt of the order dated 28th June 2021. The learned AGP has placed on record communication dated 17th August 2022 issued by the State to the Commissioner, Medical Education and Research. It is submitted that in the case of the Petitioner warning has been issued to the concerned.

Pallavi 56-cp-203-2022.doc 2.

According to the learned Advocate for the Petitioner, allegations were serious in nature. The same cannot be the subject matter of the contempt petition. The Petitioner if so desires may assail the order as may be permissible in law.

3.

As the decision is taken, contempt stands purged. Contempt petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 4.

The learned AGP on instructions submits that a copy of the documents at Reference No.4 would be provided to the petitioner i.e. dt. 30th June 2021.

(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J)