← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/15617/2022disposed off

Ashok Shankar Bhagat v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. District Collectro Sangli And ORS

2025-09-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,Hon'Ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 15617 OF 2022 Ashok Shankar Bhagat ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO. 815 OF 2022 Mansingh Krishnarao Bhagat & Ors.

... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO. 938 OF 2022 Bharat Shankarrao Patil & Ors.

... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents ------ Mr. Avinash N. Naikwadi for the Petitioners.

Mr. Pankaj Deokar, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State. ------ Coram : M. S. Karnik & Sharmila U. Deshmukh, JJ.

Date : 25th September 2025.

1 of

P. C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The reliefs prayed for in the aforesaid Petitions is for direction to the Respondent No.2, the competent Authority, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Vita Sub Division, Vita, Taluka Khanapur, District Sangli, to decide the complaint filed by the Petitioner dated 20th October 2020 as expeditiously as possible and hear the grievance of the Petitioner on its own merits and take appropriate decision regarding paying of compensation for the acquisition of subject land of the Petitioner. 3.

Learned A.G.P. has placed on record a copy of the Order dated 6th July 2021 passed by the Competent Authority in respect of the complaint made by Petitioner - Ashok Shankar Bhagat in Writ Petition No. 15617 of 2022. By the said Order it is clearly mentioned that the land of the Petitioner - Ashok Shankar Bhagat is not acquired. 4.

If the Petitioner has any grievance in respect of the Order dated 6th July 2021, it is open for the Petitioner to file appropriate proceedings challenging the Order dated 6th July 2021 on merits. 5.

We have not examined the contents of Writ Petition No. 15617 of 2022 on merits.

6.

All contentions are open to be agitated in appropriate proceedings that may be filed by the Petitioner for appropriate reliefs. 2 of

7.

Writ Petition No. 15617 of 2022 is accordingly disposed off. 8.

So far as Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 815 of 2022 is concerned, learned A.G.P. is not in a position to indicate whether the complaint dated 19th October 2020 is decided by the Competent Authority. 9.

In this view of the matter, we direct the Competent Authority to decide the complaint dated 19th October 2020 as mentioned in the prayer clause as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of four weeks from today, if not already decided. If the decision on the complaint dated 19th October 2020 is already taken, the Order may be communicated to the Petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date this Order is placed on its record.

10.

Keeping all contentions open, Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 815 of 2022 is disposed off.

11.

Detag Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 938 of 2022 and list the matter for hearing on 7th October 2025. Learned A.G.P. to take instructions. [ Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. ] [ M. S. Karnik, J. ] by OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Date:

2025.09.29 12:06:24 +0530 OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN 3 of