Pandurang Vishnu Sandage And ORS. v. Nandakumar Vadrane And ORS.
903.CP.301.2000+.doc HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.) IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.301 OF 2000 Sarva Shramik Sangh and Ors.
.. Petitioners
Versus
S.Y.Shukla and Ors.
.. Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.9 OF 2005 Sarva Shramik Sangh, Sangli .. Petitioner
Versus
Nandakumar Vadrane and Ors.
.. Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.18 OF 2005 Pandurang Vishnu Sandage and Ors.
.. Petitioners
Versus
Nandakumar Vadrane and Ors.
.. Respondents ....................
Ms. Sangeeta Salvi a/w. Mr. Sushil Kamble, Advocates for Petitioners.
Ms. Aloka A. Nadkarni, AGP for Respondent - State in Contempt Petition Nos.301 and 2000 and 18 of 2005.
Mr. A. K. Naik, AGP for Respondent - State in Contempt Petition No.9 of 2005.
Mr. Rajat Dedhia, Advocate i/by Mr. Dushyant Purekar for Respondent No.3 in Contempt Petition No.18 of 2005 and Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in Contempt Petition No.9 of 2005. ...................
CORAM
: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : AUGUST 05, 2025 P.C.
:
1.
Heard Ms. Salvi, learned Advocate for Petitioners; Ms. Nadkarni, learned AGP for Respondent - State in Contempt Petition Nos.301 and 2000 and 18 of 2005; Mr. Naik, learned AGP for
903.CP.301.2000+.doc Respondent - State in Contempt Petition No.9 of 2005 and Mr. Dedhia, learned Advocatefor Respondent No.3 in Contempt Petition No.18 of 2005 and Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in Contempt Petition No.9 of 2005 2.
Ms. Salvi has placed on record communication received on Whatsapp from the Petitioners for seeking disposal of present Contempt Petitions. The same is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.
3.
In view of compliance informed by Ms. Salvi, learned Advocate appearing for Petitioners, all three Contempt Petitions are disposed as infructuous.
H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] by HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Date: 2025.08.05 16:54:02 +0530 HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT