Akshay Sunil Jadhav v. The State Of Maharashtra

SPB/ 1/2 901-ba13-139-892-2476.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 13 OF 2016 WITH CRI. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 139 OF 2016 WITH CRI. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 892 OF 2015 WITH CRI. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2476 OF 2015 ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Office Notes, Office Memorandam of appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders.

Court's or Judge's orders ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Mr. Satyavrat Joshi, Advocate for the Applicant in BA No. 13/2016.

Mr. Rahul Kate, Advocate for the Applicant in ABA No.2476 of 2015.

Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the State.

­­­ CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J.

DATE : 01st JULY, 2016 P.C. :

Perused the letter dated 9th June, 2016, requesting for extension of time of three months to dispose of the sessions case no. 22/2015. Though learned counsel for the Applicants / accused opposed the request of extension of time prayed by the learned Additional Sessions

SPB/ 2/2 901-ba13-139-892-2476.doc Judge, Satara, I see no reason to refuse the extension of time, as prayed. Sessions case cannot be decided by directing the learned trial court to close evidence and deliver judgment only because the time, as granted by this court for disposal for the trial, comes to end. There should be finality to the decision.

Hence, extension as prayed by the learned trial court for disposing the trial is granted.

(A.M. BADAR, J.) .....