Shanta Govind Khawaskhan v. Shri Shantaram Vasudeo Mantri And ANR.

CAC­463­15­(902)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 463 OF 2015 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.417 OF 2007 Shanta Govind Khawaskhan ..Applicant Vs.

Shantaram Vasudeo Mantri & Anr ..Respondents None for the Applicant Mr. S.S.Patwardhan for the Respondents original Applicants CORAM :

R. M. SAVANT, J.

DATE :

2nd MARCH, 2016 P.C.

The office has placed the above matter in view of the incongruity in the order dated 24­2­2016 passed in the above Civil Application. The said incongruity has arisen in view of the fact that at one place in the order it is recorded that the above Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b), whereas at another place the said prayer is rejected. Though there is no substantive prayer by way of prayer clause (c), the order inadvertently refers to prayer clause (c) which is only a formal prayer. The Learned Counsel Mr. Patwardhan appearing for the original Applicants in the Civil Revision Application states that the Applicants would file a preacipe for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 24­2­2016. Hence for the present removed from board.

[R.M.SAVANT, J] mmj