← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5014/2023disposed off

Dapoli Educaation Society And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra The The Secretary School Education And Sports And ORS

2025-09-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,Hon'Ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4983 OF 2023 Dapoli Education Society & Ors.

... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5019 OF 2023 Dapoli Education Society & Ors.

... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4984 OF 2023 Dapoli Education Society & Ors.

... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5014 OF 2023 Dapoli Education Society & Ors.

... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents 1 of

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4999 OF 2023 Dapoli Education Society & Ors.

... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents ------ Mr. Utkarsh Desai i/b. Mr. Prashant Bhavake for the Petitioner. Mr. S.B. Kalel, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State. ------ Coram : M. S. Karnik & Sharmila U. Deshmukh, JJ.

Date : 29th September 2025.

ORDER ( Per : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.) 1.

Heard Mr. Desai, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. Kalel, learned A.G.P. for the Respondents-State.

2.

In these group of Petitions, the challenge is to the impugned order passed by the Respondent No.5-Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Ratnagiri, rejecting the proposals submitted seeking approvals for appointment of the Petitioners, without granting an opportunity to the Petitioners / Management to cure the deficiencies. 3.

Learned counsel for the Petitioners has drawn attention of this Court to the impugned Order of the Respondent No.5, listing the deficiencies and rejecting the approvals on the ground of the deficiencies. 2 of

He submits that no show-cause-notice was issued and no opportunity was given to the Management to cure the deficiencies. 4.

Learned A.G.P. fairly concedes that no opportunity was given to cure the deficiencies, which formed the reason for rejection of the proposals.

5.

As there was no opportunity given to the Management to cure the deficiencies, it would be appropriate if the impugned order is treated as show-cause-notice to the Petitioners/Management. The Management to submit its explanation / cure the deficiencies within a period of two weeks from today.

6.

In event, there are any additional deficiencies noticed by the Respondent No.5, the same to be communicated to the Management and opportunity be given to cure the deficiencies. The entire exercise to be completed within a period of eight weeks from today. 7.

All Writ Petitions are disposed of with directions as above. 8.

In event, the approval is granted by the Respondent No.5, the Respondent No.4 to allot the Shalarth I.D. to the Petitioner No.3 expeditiously.

[ Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. ] [ M. S. Karnik, J. ] by OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Date:

2025.09.30 10:26:12 +0530 OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN 3 of