The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Shri. Laxman Govind Dungahu And Others

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.609 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.18469 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders None Present.

CORAM : AJIT N. MARE, REGISTRAR (JUDL - II) Date : 21st March, 2016 Perusal of proceedings reveal that address of Respondent No.3 mentioned in the Appeal Memo is the same address mentioned in the judgment in the Tribunal. The judgment of Tribunal also reveals that Respondent No.3 was proceeded exparte. It means he was served. In view of this, the Notice was issued to Respondent No.3 on correct address. Considering the Bailiff's remark, it appears that substituted service by way of Publication is the best mode of serving of Respondent No.3. Hence Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Issue Publication Notice to Respondent No.3, returnable after 8 weeks.

Civil Application No.609 of 2016 is disposed of.

sd/­ Registrar (Judl.­II) dsm - R(J­II) - 21.03.16