Veersinh Fattesinh Patil And ANR. v. Dinesh Nathu Patel And ORS.

Trupti 903-caw-3025-17.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION No. 3025 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION No.12486 OF 2015 Veersinh Fattesinh Patil & Anr.

...Applicants

Versus

Dinesh Nathu Patel & Ors.

...Respondents

......

Mr.Sameer Kadam h/f. Mr. Nilesh S. Patil for the Applicants. Mr.M.M. Pabale for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.

......

CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.

DATED:

JULY 05, 2018 P.C. :

1.

The learned Counsel holding for Advocate Nilesh S. Patil informs the Court that he is not well, however, leave note is not on record.

2.

On 7th June, 2018, the learned Counsel for the applicants remained present and sought adjournment. Hence, the matter was adjourned to 21st June, 2018 for dismissal. On that day, he remained absent.

Trupti 903-caw-3025-17.doc 3.

On perusal of the earlier orders, it appears that the learned Counsel for the applicants did not bother to remain present and, therefore, this Court by order dated 19th January, 2017 dismissed the Petition. Hence, the Civil Application for restoration of the Petition was made. Though the circulation was taken earlier, he did not remain present. Hence, Civil Application is dismissed. 4.

In view of dismissal of the Civil Application, Writ Petition does not survive and the same is accordingly disposed of. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)