Shri. Sakharam Mahadev Naik v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary And ORS.

Urmila Ingale 28-cp-351-19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION by URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Date:

2023.03.09 13:09:02 +0530 URMILA PRAMOD INGALE CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 351 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 106 OF 2016 Shri Sakharam Mahadeo Naik ..Petitioner VS.

The State of Maharashtra and ors.

..Respondents Mr. Swapnil Telang a/w Mr. Umesh R. Mankapure, for the Petitioner.

Mr. N.M. Pabale, AGP for the State -Respondent No.1. Mr. Ajit R. Pitale, for Respondents no. 2 to 6. CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, ACJ & SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

DATED : MARCH 8, 2023 P.C. :

1.

The contempt petition is filed on the premise that in terms of the order dated 03/08/2016 in the Writ Petition No. 106 of 2016, the representation is not yet decided. 2.

The request of the petitioner for ACPS benefit is negatived vide order dated dated 18/11/2016.

3.

In view of that, the contempt 4.

stands purged. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the respondents negativing the claim of the 1/2

Urmila Ingale 28-cp-351-19.odt petitioner, then the petitioner is entitled to assail the same in accordance with law.

5.

The contempt petition is disposed of. No costs. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 2/2