Shri.Sumant Balkrishna Pilankar v. Shri. Tukaram Laxman Rane

KVM 1/2 902 - CAS 1767 OF 2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1767 OF 2017 KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date: 2023.12.08 11:02:27 +0530 KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 3758 OF 2017 Sumant Balkrishna Pilankar ..... Applicant

VERSUS

Tukaram Laxman Rane & Ors.

..... Respondents Mr.Sushil A. Inamdar i/b. Mr.B.H.Salunkhe for the Applicant. Mr.Abhijit M.Adagule for the Respondent No.1. Mr.Omkar S.Paranjape for the Respondent Nos. 6 and 7. CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 6th DECEMBER, 2023 P.C. :- This civil application is filed for condoning the delay in filing the Second Appeal. There is a delay of 16 days in filing the Second Appeal.

2.

In paragraph (3) of the civil application, it has been mentioned that the advocate appearing for the applicant was in personal difficulty due to death in the family of the advocate on record and he had to rush to his native place. After coming from the native place, immediately thereafter the present Second Appeal has been filed. Hence, there is

KVM 2/2 902 - CAS 1767 OF 2017.doc delay in filing the Second Appeal.

3.

Learned advocate appearing for the respondent nos. 6 and 7 opposes this application.

4.

I have gone through the contents of the civil application and after hearing the parties, I am of the view that the grounds are made out to allow this civil application.

5.

Hence, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Civil Application is accordingly disposed off. [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]