← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/589/2016others disposed off

Sandipan Ganpati Bhosale v. Reshma Dinesh Bhosale And ORS

2018-02-23Hon'Ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere2 pages

WP 589-16.doc Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 589 OF 2016 Sandipan Ganpati Bhosale .Petitioner Vs.

Smt. Reshma Dinesh Bhosale & ors.

.Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 295 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 589 OF 2016 Smt. Reshma Dinesh Bhosale .Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Sandipan Ganpati Bhosale .Petitioner Vs.

Smt. Reshma Dinesh Bhosale & ors.

.Respondents Ms Tanya Patankar i/b. Mr. P. M. Jadhav, Advocate, for the Petitioner Mr. H. Ghadigaonkar, Advocate, for the Respondent No. 1 Mr. Y. Y. Dabke, APP, for the Respondent - State

CORAM

:

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE :

23.02.2018 P.C.

.

Both, learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned counsel for the Respondent No. 1 state that the parties have amicably settled their dispute and have filed Consent Terms in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jat, District - Sangli before whom the Domestic Violence proceedings were pending. A copy of the

WP 589-16.doc Consent Terms entered into is tendered. The said Consent Terms are taken on record and marked as "X" for identification. 2.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner be permitted to withdraw a sum of Rs. 50,000/- alongwith accrued interest, if any which is deposited in this Court. 3.

Learned counsel for the Respondent No. 1 has no objection. 4.

Accordingly, the Petitioner is permitted to withdraw a sum of Rs. 50,000/- alongwith accrued interest, if any, till date on showing proof of his identity.

5.

In view of the Consent Terms, learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Petition. 6.

Accordingly, the Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. 7.

In view of disposal of the Writ Petition, the Cri. Appln. No. 295 of 2016 does not survive and the same is also disposed of. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)