Sunanda Jaypal Choudhari v. State Of Maharashtra

34-ABA-359-24.DOC Sayali Upasani

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.- 359 OF 2024 Sunanda Jaypal Choudhari ... Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Ayush Pasbola i/b Sudhir Bhardwaj, for Applicant. SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI Mr. Tanveer Khan, APP for State/Respondent No. 1. Mr. S. M. Gaikwad, PSI, Islampur Police Station, Present. SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI Date: 2024.04.17 11:11:13 +0530 CORAM:- N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED:- 15th APRIL, 2024.

PC:- 1) Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2) The learned Counsel for the applicant on instructions submits that in terms of the order dated 26th March, 2024, the applicant has appeared before the Investigating Officer and cooperated with investigation. 3) By an order dated 27th February, 2024, this Court had granted interim bail ascribing reasons.

1/2

34-ABA-359-24.DOC 4) In view of the fact that the applicant has appeared before the Investigating Officer and co-operated with the investigation and the allegations of fraud are primarily against the co-accused, I am impelled to make the interim bail absolute. 5) Hence, the following order.

ORDER

i) The order of Interim Bail dated 27th February, 2024 is made absolute on the terms and conditions incorporated therein.

ii) In addition, the applicant shall regularly attend the proceedings before the jurisdictional Court. iv) It is clarified that these prima facie observations are confined to determine the entitlement to pre-arrest bail only.

v) The application stands disposed.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2