The State Of Maharashtra v. Isak Mahamad Mukadam

210-FA-646-2002.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.646 OF 2002 The State of Maharashtra .... Appellant V/s.

Isak Mahamad Mukadam .... Respondent ---- Mr.A.R. Patil, AGP, for the Appellant-State.

None for the Respondent.

NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Date: 2024.08.01 11:26:21 +0530 ---- CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 31st JULY 2024 P.C:- 1.

In the instant case, the SLAO has granted compensation of Rs.6,072/- which is further enhanced by the Reference Court to Rs.30,000/- along with statutory component. The amount being meagre, this Court would not entertain the appeal filed by the State and the appeal is accordingly dismissed. 2.

It is made clear that the appeal is not decided on merits and will have no bearing on other appeals where the quantum of compensation granted is large.

N.S. Kamble page 1 of 2

210-FA-646-2002.doc 3.

In view of the dismissal of the Appeal, bank guarantee or solvent surety given at the time of the withdrawal of the amounts before the executing Court would stand discharged. 4.

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.) N.S. Kamble page 2 of 2