Shri. Sadashiv Mahadeo Anpat v. Shri. Shivaji Khashaba Salunkhe And ORS.

47-FA-1245-17.doc JYOTI RAJESH MANE IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION by JYOTI RAJESH MANE Date: 2025.04.03 16:54:53 +0530 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1245 OF 2017.

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3537 OF 2017 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1245 OF 2017.

Shri. Sadashiv Mahadeo Anpat ...Appellant.

Versus

Shri. Shivaji Khashaba Salunkhe And Ors.

...Respondents.

------ Ms. Pooja Satpute i/b. Vaibhav Gaikwad for the Appellant. Mr. Kirankumar Phakde, for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. ------ Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.

Date : April 1, 2025.

P. C. :

1.

By Order of 25th March 2025, as none had appeared for the Appellant the First Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution. Later on the Advocate for the Appellant had appeared and sought recall of the Order, which came to be recalled and matter was listed today. Today, again the learned counsel appearing for Appellant seeks accommodation. The First Appeal is of the year 2017 and has not been argued for admission yet. The Appeal cannot be permitted to be adjourned in this manner, particularly considering that the Appeal is of the year 2017 and is still pending admission. Mane 1 of

47-FA-1245-17.doc 2.

As the learned counsel for the Appellant is not ready for argument, the First Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. 3.

Interim Application do not survive for consideration. [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Mane 2 of