Ramesh Nana Morajkar v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS
(Prod)WP482917 & group.doc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4829 OF 2017 Ramesh Nana Morajkar ..Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.6185 OF 2018 Sagar S/o Arjun Thakur ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.6186 OF 2018 Kashiram S/o Arjun Thakur ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4649 OF 2015 Surendra Bhagwan Morajkar ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.6842 OF 2015 Prafulla Vitthal Thakur ..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3201 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6842 OF 2015 BGP. 1 of 2
(Prod)WP482917 & group.doc.
Prafulla Vitthal Thakur ..Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.7643 OF 2015 Yogesh Shantaram More ..Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra and another ..Respondents Mr. Sushant C. Yeramwar, Advocate for the Petitioners in all the Writ Petitions.
Mr. S. B. Kalel, AGP for Respondent - State in all the Writ Petitions and Civil Application.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JJ.
DATE : 8th APRIL, 2019 P.C.
1] Not on board. Mentioned at 11:00 a.m.
2] Learned counsel for the Petitioners has moved this Court for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 25th February 2019. It is stated that after second sentence in 4th paragraph, the Court has dictated as under : "The Respondent - Scrutiny Committee shall decide the matter on remand within a period of three months from the date of uploading of the order."
3] The contention appears to be correct. The said sentence be inserted after the second sentence in 4th paragraph. [DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.] [B. R. GAVAI, J.] BGP. 2 of 2