Vimal Bhausaheb Gunjal v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1 / 2 18-WP-1622-22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1622 OF 2022 Vimal Bhausaheb Gunjal & Anr.

.... Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

.... Respondents .......

• Ms. Ankita Bamboli a/w Jatia Chawda, Advocate for Petitioners.

• Smt. M. H. Mhatre, APP for the State/Respondent.

CORAM

: SARANG V. KOTWAL & S. M. MODAK, JJ.

DATE : 30th APRIL, 2025 P.C. :

1.

In this matter, by way of ad-interim relief, the Investigating Officer was directed not to submit charge-sheet against the Petitioners. Today, we have heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners. The investigation has not culminated in filing of the charge-sheet because of the ad-interim relief. After hearing the Petitioners, we showed our disinclination to Digitally signed by MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Date:

2025.05.05 14:48:11 +0530 grant relief at this stage. Therefore, the learned counsel for the MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Petitioners does not press this Petition at this stage, but seeks Nesarikar

2 / 2 18-WP-1622-22.odt liberty to adopt the appropriate proceedings in accordance with law if the police decide to file charge-sheet against the Petitioners.

2.

Considering this submission, the Petition is disposed of as not pressed. Ad-interim order stands vacated. 3.

If the police file charge-sheet against the Petitioners, they are at liberty adopt appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.

4.

With this liberty, the Petition is disposed of. (S. M. MODAK J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)