Shubham Sunil Pore v. The Union Of India And ORS

77.IANo.19522022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1952 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2666 OF 2021 Shubham Sunil Pore ...

Applicant In the Matter Between :

Shubham Sunil Pore ...

Petitioner

Versus

The Union of India & Ors.

...

Respondents Mr. Vishwanath S. Talkute, Advocate for the Applicant/ Original Petitioner Adv. S. M. Seegarla a/w. Adv. Swapnil Shikhare and Adv. Shalaka Chamboowala i/b. RMG Law Associates, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.

CORAM:

S.V. GANGAPURWALA & VINAY JOSHI, JJ.

DATED :

APRIL 6, 2022 P.C.

1.

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the amendment is necessitated because the subsequent communication canceling the subject location has been received. We have heard the learned Advocate for the nonapplicant also. 2.

Writ petition is not admitted. Writ petition is at the nascent stage. In case the amendment is allowed, the nonapplicant will have every opportunity to controvert the averments sought to be introduced by amendment. Gaikwad RD 1/2

77.IANo.19522022.doc 3.

For the reasons stated in the application, the interim application for amendment is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

(VINAY JOSHI, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) Digitally signed by RAJU DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD Date:

2022.04.08 16:08:48 +0530 RAJU DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD Gaikwad RD 2/2