Shri. Vishwaskumar Vithal Ghodke v. State Of Maharashtra And ORS

1/2 wp-3923-14.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3923 OF 2014 ...

Shri Vishwaskumar V.Ghodke

...Petitioner

v/s.

State of Maharashtra & ors.

...Respondents

...

Mr.V.K.Budhare I/b A.M.Joshi for the Petitioner. Ms.S.S.Bhende, AGP for Respondents Nos. 1 & 2. Mr.Suhas Inamdar for Respondent No.3.

Mr.I.M.Khairdi for Respondent No.4.

...

CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA & A.A.SAYED, JJ.

DATED : 31 AUGUST 2015 ORDER:

Rule. Returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties. 2.

We are inclined to dispose of the present Petition by permitting the Management (for the Petitioner) to move a proposal for absorption considering the case of the Petitioner being surplus. The Management by communication dated 7­7­2012 already intimated the same to Respondent No.2 and as stated has not decided till this date. Therefore, to avoid further delay, by keeping all points open, we direct the Management to submit a fresh proposal within two weeks and Respondent No.2 to decide the same as Uday P. Kambli 1/2

2/2 wp-3923-14.doc early as possible, preferably within six weeks after receipt of the same, in accordance with law.

3.

The Petition is disposed of with liberty. Rule discharged. No costs.

(A.A. SAYED, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA J.) Uday P. Kambli 2/2