Ramchandra Raghunath Igave And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr The Tahsildar

23-WP-3992-2022.doc Shailaja

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3992 OF 2022 Ramchandra Raghunath Igave and others ] Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra ] Respondent .....

Mr. Nilesh Patil, for Petitioner.

Mr. R.P. Kadam "B" Panel Counsel, for Respondent - State. .....

CORAM : M.S. KARNIK & AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ.

DATE : 1st DECEMBER, 2025.

P.C:

1.

Mr. Patil, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has collected papers from him and that he would be making an arrangement to engage an Advocate of his choice. Mr. Patil, is therefore, discharged from appearing in the matter.

2.

We find that with the passage of time, reliefs prayed for in the present petition are rendered infructuous. Hence, the petition is disposed of. Liberty to apply for restoration if the petitioner satisfies that cause still survives. [AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.] [M.S. KARNIK, J.] SHAILAJA SHRIKANT HALKUDE SHAILAJA SHRIKANT HALKUDE Date: 2025.12.03 10:25:25 +0530