Tanaji Sambhaji Kharat v. The State Of Maharashtra

: 1 :

16-aba-847-21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 847 OF 2021 Tanaji Sambhaji Kharat .... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ______ Mr. Uday B. Nighot for Applicant.

Ms. P. N. Dabholkar, APP for State/Respondent. ______ CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 23rd MARCH, 2021 P.C. :

1.

At the outset, learned APP, on instructions, makes a statement that the investigating agency does not want to arrest the applicant. The statement is recorded and accepted. 2.

In this situation, learned counsel for the applicant does not press this application.

3.

It is clarified that, if in future, if the investigating agency needs his arrest in connection with the same offence, the investigating agency shall give four clear working days' notice to Gokhale

: 2 :

16-aba-847-21.odt the applicant to enable him to take appropriate steps to protect himself. The applicant shall attend the concerned police station, as and when called, and shall co-operate with the investigation. 4.

With this direction, the application is disposed of as not pressed.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)