Mrs. Jayshree Ravindra Kale v. Mr. Ravindra Vitthal Kale

54. MCA-93-2019.doc BDP-SPS-TAC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 93 OF 2019 by BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT Date: 2022.03.07 19:10:37 +0530 MRS. JAYSHREE RAVINDRA KALE ...Applicant.

V/s MR. RAVINDRA VITTHAL KALE

...Respondent

Mr. M. V. Thorat for the Applicant.

Ms. Pradnya Kadam for the Respondent.

CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE: MARCH 07, 2022 P.C.:- 1] Ms. Pradnya Kadam, learned Counsel appears for non-applicant and seeks time of one week to file appearance on behalf of non-applicant. Time granted.

2] Counsel for the non-applicant on instructions extends consent for granting prayer for transfer in terms of prayer clause (a) of the Application. 3] As such, Application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Accordingly, Hindu Marriage Petition No.66 of 2017 pending on the file of Civil Judge (S.D.), Vaduj is directed to be transferred to the Civil Judge (S.D.) Pandharpur, District Solapur.

4] Application is disposed of.

( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. ) 1/1