Rachandra Gena Devkar v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary And ORS.

(17) WP 4506-18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Amk WRIT PETITION NO. 4506 OF 2018 Ramchandra Gena Devkar .. Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

.. Respondents Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay for the Petitioner.

Mr. K. S. Thorat, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.

DATE : 1 st OCTOBER, 2019.

P. C. :

1.

This is a very funny Petition.

2.

The Petitioner pleads that he is founder member of Shelgaon Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Shelgaon, a society which has established various educational institutions one of them being a Junior College at Shelgaon. It is pleaded that one Shri Tanaji Bhagwat Kakade, who was Ex-Principal, has resorted to fabrication of the record. It is pleaded that in the year 2013-14 one Siddheshwar Mule was Principal of the Junior College who on 30.08.2013 supplied online information concerning enrollment of students. Based thereon the workload was finalized. Eight full time teaching posts were approved. It is pleaded that as per the information provided no student had opted for the subject Political Science. Therefore, the workload for the said subject was treated as nil. 1/2

(17) WP 4506-18 It is pleaded that based thereon, the Deputy Director of Education approved the workload and sanctioned teaching and non teaching staff to the College. It is pleaded that one Shri A. B. Kamble was working as a Teacher in the discipline of Political Science in the said college. He was declared as surplus. He was directed to join Sant Damaji College, Mangalvedha, District-Solapur. It is pleaded that Shri Kamble with the support of Shri Kakade fabricated the record with the object that Shri Kamble continues to serve at the Junior College in Shelgaon. It is pleaded that when the said fabrication came to the notice of the Petitioner, a representation dated 27.11.2017 was made to the Respondents.

3.

Grievance is to the said representation not being decided. 4.

In the representation, permission sought is to register an FIR. 5.

Now, if the Petitioner, who is founder member of the society which has established the institution, has knowledge and material to prove the falsification of the record, he may proceed to lodge FIR. No permission is warranted.

6.

The Petition is dismissed.

[SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] 2/2