← Library
Bombay High CourtBA/929/2023allowed to be withdrawn

Vijay @ Vicky @ Vikas Santram Gosavi v. The State Of Maharashtra

2024-07-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor2 pages

4-BA-929-23+.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 929 OF 2023 Vijay @ Vicky @ Vikas Santram Gosavi ...Applicant Vs.

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 951 OF 2023 by SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI Date: 2024.07.10 10:12:49 +0530 Amol Sachin Sathe ...Applicant Vs.

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

AND BAIL APPLICATION NO. 950 OF 2023 Akash @ Gendya Santosh Jadhav ...Applicant Vs.

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Ramnik P. Pawar, Advocate for Applicant in All Applications. Mrs. Geeta Mulekar, APP for State-Respondent in BA No.929 of 2023 and BA No.951 of 2023.

Mrs. Veera Shinde, APP for State-Respondent in BA No.950 of 2023. 1/2 Sayali Upasani

4-BA-929-23+.DOC CORAM:- ANIL S. KILOR, J.

DATED:- 9th JULY, 2024 PC :- 1) After hearing for some time and when the Court was not inclined to grant bail, learned counsel for Applicants seeks leave to withdraw bail applications with liberty to move afresh if there is no progress in trial. 2) Permission is granted to withdraw the bail applications. 3) Considering the period of incarceration of Applicants, liberty is granted to move afresh after six months before Trial Court, if there is no progress in the trial. The learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.

4) The learned Counsel for the applicants undertakes to submit a copy of this order on the record of the trial Court within a one week. 5) The Bail Applications are disposed of as withdraw with liberty as prayed for.

[ANIL S. KILOR, J.] 2/2 Sayali Upasani