Shri. Gopal Babulal Lalbeg v. Kumar Gorakhnath Shinde And ORS
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5189 OF 2014 Shri Gopal Babulal Lalbeg ... Petitioner Vs.
Kumar Gorakhnath Shinde and Ors.
... Respondents Mr. R.K. Mendadkar, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Balkrishna D. Joshi, for the Respondent No.1. Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP, for Respondent Nos.3 to 5. CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K. MENON, JJ.
DATE : 24th FEBRUARY, 2015 P.C.
.
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, the learned counsel appearing for the first Respondent and the learned AGP for third, fourth, fifth and sixth Respondents. The first challenge in this th November, 2011 Petition is to the caste validity certificate dated 20 issued to the first Respondent by the fourth Respondent Caste Scrutiny th Committee. The second challenge is to the caste certificate dated 28 July, 2000 issued by the sixth Respondent to the first Respondent. The caste certificate issued by the sixth Respondent records that the first Respondent belongs to 'Mahar' a Scheduled Caste. The said caste certificate has been validated under the impugned order passed by the fourth Respondent Scrutiny Committee.
2.
As per the order of this Court, the learned AGP has produced the record of the Scrutiny Committee. We have perused the record. The first order passed by the fourth Respondent - Caste Scrutiny Committee on the application made by the first Respondent is a direction to the first Respondent to produce pre1950 documents. There is an order passed by the fourth Respondent Committee in the th November, 2011 which consists of only 8 to 9 Roznama dated 20 words by which the caste claim of the first Respondent is held to be valid. Perusal of the file shows that even vigilance cell inquiry was not ordered by the Caste Scrutiny Committee. Therefore, the impugned th November, caste validity certificate and the impugned order dated 20 2011 will have to be quashed and set aside with a direction to the fourth Respondent - Caste Scrutiny Committee to decide the caste claim of the Petitioner afresh in accordance with law. 3.
The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits th July, 2000 issued to the first that the caste certificate dated 28 Respondent is invalid. His submission is that the certificate is not issued in proper form.
4.
The Caste Scrutiny Committee will have to decide the issue of caste claim of the first Respondent and, therefore, the Caste Scrutiny
Committee will have to consider the aspect whether the caste certificate is void as contended by the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. 5.
As we propose to remand the matter for a fresh inquiry by the fourth Respondent - Scrutiny Committee, the prayer made for setting aside the election of the first Respondent cannot be entertained at this stage.
6.
Accordingly, we dispose of the Petition by passing the following order :
ORDER
th November, 2011 (i) We set aside the order dated 20 passed by the fourth Respondent Caste Scrutiny Committee as well as the caste validity certificate of the same date issued to the first Respondent;
(ii) We direct the fourth Respondent - Committee to hold a fresh inquiry in accordance with law after ordering a vigilance cell inquiry. We direct the Petitioner and the first Respondent to appear before the fourth Respondent th March, 2015 at 11.00 am for fixing the schedule on 16 of hearing. The Caste Scrutiny Committee will permit the parties to file additional documents;
th July, (iii) The issue whether the caste certificate dated 28 2000 is void will be decided by the Caste Scrutiny Committee;
(iv) After making an appropriate adjudication in accordance with law, a fresh order shall be passed by the fourth Respondent as expeditiously as possible and preferably th March, 2015;
within a period of four months from 16 (v) All contentions on the caste claim of the first Respondent are kept open to be decided by the Caste Scrutiny Committee.
(vi) Rule is made partly absolute on above terms. No order as to costs;
(vii) All concerned to act upon an authenticated copy of this order.
(A.K. MENON, J ) (A.S.OKA, J )