Vasudeo G. Kulkarni v. The State Of Maharashtr

171-FA-1104-95

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL No. 1104 OF 1995 Vasudeo G. Kulkarni ...Appellant versus The State of Maharashtra and anr.

...Respondents

Mr. Anshuman Deshmukh a/w Kshema M. i/b T. D. Deshmukh for the Appellant.

Mr. A. R. Patil, AGP for the State.

Mr. Swaraj Subhash Patil i/b Ramesh Dube Patil for RespondentK.V.D.C. Mr. Viraj Pardeshi (Authorized Representative- M.K.V.D.C.), present. Mr. Santosh Deshmukh SLAO No. 1, present.

CORAM :

N. R. BORKAR, J.

(HEAD OF THE PANEL) :

R.B. BHAGWAT, REGISTRAR MEMBER :

P.R. NAVALE, DEPUTY REGISTRAR MEMBER DATE :

03.03.2024 P.C. :- .

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the present matter was listed before the Lok Adalat on 09.12.2023 and on that day consent terms were filed and the matter was disposed of in terms of consent terms, how1/2

171-FA-1104-95 ever, inadvertently the order dated 09.12.2023 records that there is no settlement and the matter be placed before the regular Court. It is submitted that even in Case Information System the matter is shown to be disposed of. 2.

Learned AGP does not dispute the above position. 3.

The consent terms duly singed by the parties and their Advocates are there on record.

4.

The consent terms are within the ambit of Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code.

5.

Consent terms are marked 'X' for the purpose of identification. 6.

The Appeal is disposed of in terms of consent terms. 7.

The Award/Decree be prepared in terms of consent terms. 8.

The Court fees, if any, be refunded as per rules. (P.R.NAVALE) (R. B. BHAGWAT) ( N. R. BORKAR, J.) MEMBER MEMBER HEAD OF THE PANEL 2/2