Iranna Raghunath Shelewade v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

24-APPLN-243-2021.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 243 OF 2021 Iranna Raghunath Shelewade ...

Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...

Respondents .....

Mr. Anand S. Patil, for the Applicant.

Mr. A. A. Palkar, APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. Chetan Patil a/w Mr. Bhushan S. Jadhav i/b Mandar G. Bagkar, for Respondent No.2.

Mr. Shekhar A. Ingawale, for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4. .....

CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.

DATED : 23rd APRIL, 2024.

P.C.

Heard learned Counsel Mr. Patil for the applicantcomplainant, Mr. Chetan Patil for respondent No.2 and Mr. Ingawale for respondent Nos. 3 and 4.

It is informed that the trial Court has already framed the charge and the trial has commenced. Learned Counsel for the parties, therefore, are ad-idem that the trial can be expedited by directing the respondents-accused to attend each date unless REKHA PRAKASH PATIL exempted from appearance for compelling reasons. REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2024.04.24 17:28:27 +0530 Rekha Patil

24-APPLN-243-2021.doc The application, therefore, stands disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to decide the case as expeditiously as possible without granting unnecessary adjournments to any of the parties unless there are compelling circumstances.

The respondents-accused shall attend each date scrupulously. Needless to say that the respondents-accused shall not either directly or indirectly influence or tamper any of the prosecution witnesses.

Application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.] Rekha Patil