Chandgad Taluka Shetkari Sahakari Vikri Sangh Ltd. Thru Directors Tanaji P Gadkari v. State Of Maharashtra And ORS

rpa 1/2 13-wp-4303-19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4303 OF 2019 Chandgad Taluka Shetkari Sahakari Vikri Sangh Ltd.

.. Petitioner Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

.. Respondents ......

Mr.A.V. Anturkar, Senior Advocate i/b. Mr.Tanaji Mhatugade, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr.N.C. Walimbe, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.B.R. Mandlik i/b. Mr.S.S. Patwardhan, Advocate for Respondent No.3.

Mr.G.S. Godbole a/w. Mr.Drupad Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.4.

Mr.T.S. Ingale, Advocate for Respondent No.6. ......

CORAM : A.A. SAYED AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.

DATED : SEPTEMBER 03, 2019.

P.C. :

In 2nd line of paragraph no.1 of order dated 3rd April, 2019, the word "lease deed" be corrected to read "Leave and Licence Agreement". The order dated 3rd April, 2019 be corrected accordingly.

rpa 2/2 13-wp-4303-19.doc The Petitioner has challenged the measures taken under the SARFAESI Act. The Petitioner has an alternate remedy before the DRT. In the circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain the Petition. The Petition is dismissed with liberty to the Petitioner to approach the DRT.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (A.A. SAYED, J.)