Sau.D.S.Paprikar v. Shri.P.G.Pore And ORS.

6-SA-318-1994.docx

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION rrpillai SECOND APPEAL NO. 318 OF 1994 Sau D. S. Paprikar ...

Appellant Vs.

Shri P. G. Pore and Others ...

Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4615 OF 1997 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.318 OF 1994 Smt. Narmadabai Mahdavrao Shinde ...

Applicant Vs.

Hiraman Vishwanath Divate ...

Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5504 OF 1994 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3943 OF1996 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.318 OF 1994 Sou. Devikabai S. Paprikar ...

Applicant Vs.

Shri Patlu Gyanu Pore ...

Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO.10971 OF 1995 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.318 OF 1994 by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date:

2024.11.29 10:59:20 +0200 RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI 1/2

6-SA-318-1994.docx Shri Sopan Patalu Pore ...

Applicant Vs.

Smt. Devikabai Sadashiv Paprikar ...

Respondent None for the Appellant.

Mr. Prabha Badadare i/b. Mr. P. R. Arjunwadkar for Respondent No. 1C.

CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.

DATE :

28th NOVEMBER 2024 ORDER :

1.

Office remarks shows that notice issue to appellants is returned unserved with remarks 'not residing on the mentioned address and is not traceable'. Even on the last occasion none had appeared for the appellant.

2.

Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. 3.

Pending applications, if any, are disposed of infructuous. [GAURI GODSE, J.] 2/2