Shailaja Laxman Mahajan v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

1/2 8 wp 3777.21.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition No. 3777 of 2021 Shailaja Laxman Mahajan ...

Petitioner v/s.

The State of Maharashtra & ors.

...

Respondents Mr. Sanjay D. Thokade for the Petitioner.

Mr. S.B.Kalel, AGP for State.

Mr Anand Kulkarni for Respondent No.2.

Mr. Prakash Mahadik for Respondent No.5.

CORAM : SUNIL B.SHUKRE & AMIT BORKAR, JJ.

16th February 2022 P.C.

Digitally signed by LATA SUNIL PANJWANI Date:

2022.02.17 11:38:26 +0530 Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent LATA SUNIL PANJWANI of the parties.

2.

The appointment of the Petitioner as the Assistant Teacher has received approval of Respondent No.2 - Education Officer (Primary) Zilla Parishad. The only issue that remains is about payment of salary to the Petitioner. Learned Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3

2/2 8 wp 3777.21.doc submits that the Education Officer has sent a proposal to the Dy. Director (Education) for allocating Shalarth IDs to the Petitioner so that salary can be paid to the Petitioner.

3.

Considering the fact that approval has been granted to the appointment of the Petitioner as Assistant Teacher, there is no reason for the Dy. Director to not grant Shalarth IDs to the Petitioner and, therefore, we direct the Respondent No.1 to see that Shalarth ID is allocated to the Petitioner within a reasonable period of time, preferably within six weeks from the date of receipt of the order. 4.

Rule made absolute accordingly. No costs.

(AMIT BORKAR,J) (SUNIL B.SHUKRE,J) Lata Panjwani, P.S.