Mr. Sourabh Surendra Tatke v. Renu Rajaram Dandekar And ORS.

praecipe 2-ara-14-2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 14 OF 2022 Sourabh Surendra Tatke ...Appellant Vs.

Renu Rajaram Dandekar & Ors.

...Respondents

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 9875 OF 2022 IN ARBITRATION APPEAL NO. 14 OF 2022 WITH ARBITRATION PETITION (ST) NO. 20625 OF 2022 Renu Rajaram Dandekar ...Applicant/Petitioner Vs.

Savli Developers through its Sole Prop. Saurabh Surendra Tatke

...Respondent

Digitally signed by MAMTA AMAR KALE Date:

2022.12.09 12:58:10 +0530 ---- MAMTA AMAR KALE Mr. Abhishek Salian i/b. Vidhi Partners, for the Appellant. Mr. Niranjan Kandade i/b. Mr. Nandu Pawar, for the Respondent in ARA/14/2022.

---- CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J.

DATE : 8 DECEMBER 2022 P.C.

.

Not on board. Mentioned by way of praecipe. It is submitted that the appearance on behalf of one of the parties has been wrongly mentioned in the order dated 5/12/2022. It is also Mamta Kale

praecipe 2-ara-14-2022.doc requested that the word 'Decree be drawn up accordingly' may be added in order to facilitate preparation of a decree as per the Consent Terms.

2.

The appearance be corrected as stated in the praecipe and it is directed that towards the end of the order dated 5/12/2022, it shall be further recorded as follows:

"Decree be drawn up accordingly"

3.

The order dated 5/12/2022 be corrected and uploaded on the website.

4.

The praecipe is disposed of.

MANISH PITALE, J.

Mamta Kale