Uttam Dadarao Mhaske v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

skn 1 8-WP-2002.2019.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2002 OF 2019 Uttam Dadarao Mhaske.

...

Petitioner.

V/s.

The State of Maharashtra and others.

...

Respondents.

Mr.Pradeep Zende for the Petitioner.

Ms.A.S.Pai, GP for Respondent No.1.

Ms.Bhavana Punalekar i/b. Shakuntala Wadekar for Respondent No.6.

Digitally signed by SANJAY KASHINATH NANOSKAR Date:

2021.10.08 16:30:13 +0530 CORAM :

NITIN JAMDAR AND SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

SANJAY KASHINATH NANOSKAR DATE :

6 October 2021.

P.C. :

The Petitioner has filed this petition for a limited relief as under:

(b) that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate order, direction or writ, thereby directing the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 to decide the letters-cum-representations of the Petitioner dated 21st June 2016 and 13th August 2018 within a period of one month or within such other period from the order of the Court, as the Court deems fit.

skn 2 8-WP-2002.2019.doc Neither the counsel for the Petitioner and the Respondents nor the learned APP is able to inform the Court whether the representations are decided as on date.

2.

If the representations are not yet decided, Respondent Nos.1 to 3 (the concerned authorities) will take a decision on the representations of the Petitioner within a period of eight weeks from today on its own merits and strictly as per the law. This direction should not be construed as reflection on the contentions of the Petitioner or of the private respondents.

3.

Writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)