Mr. Macchindra Appasaheb Patil v. The Union Of India, Through Principal Secretary, The Ministry Of Water Resources And ORS

4-PIL-94-2013.DOC jsn

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.94 OF 2013 Mr. Macchindra Appasaheb Patil ... Petitioner

Versus

The Union of India & Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. M.A. Patil for the Petitioner Mr. Y.R. Mishra with Mr. N.R. Prajapati for Respondent No.1. Mr. B.V. Samant, AGP for State - Respondent Nos.2 to 5. Mr. V.D. Patil, for Respondent No.6.

CORAM:

S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & R. I. CHAGLA, JJ.

DATED:

5TH NOVEMBER 2019 PC:- 1.

After having heard the parties at some length and perusing the PIL, its annexures as also Affidavits in Reply, we are of the opinion that this PIL has served its purpose. 2.

Undisputedly, the concerned area in relation to which this PIL has been filed has been the beneficiary of a project. The appropriate sanction has been granted. The budgetary allocation is made and the funds are also expended. All this is resulted in the work in Sangola, Taluka being completed. Therefore, the project as envisaged (Tembhu) lift irrigation project in so far as Taluka 1/2

4-PIL-94-2013.DOC Sangola, District Solapur is now complete.

3.

In the circumstances, the PIL is disposed of. ( R. I. CHAGLA, J. ) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) 2/2