← Library
Bombay High CourtBA/1074/2018others disposed off

Siddharth Sukhdev Chiprikar v. The State Of Maharashtra

2018-07-24Hon'Ble Smt. Justice S.S. Jadhav2 pages

02­BA­669­18 with BA 1074­18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 669 OF 2018 Sanjay Annappa Vhasmani .... Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra .... Respondent WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1074 OF 2018 Siddharth Sukhdev Chiprikar .... Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ­­­­­ • Mr. Umesh H. Pawar for applicant in B.A.No.669/18. • Mr. B. D. Shinde, for applicant in B.A.No.1074/18. • Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for the State/Respondent. ­­­­­ CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 14th JUNE, 2019 P.C. :

1.

Vide order dated 24/07/2018 this court (Coram: Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav, J.) had directed the Sessions Judge, Sangli to conclude the recording of evidence as far as possible within eight months from the date of framing of charge. The Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli has submitted the report. It is mentioned that the prosecution intends to examine more witnesses and has V.B.Gokhale

02­BA­669­18 with BA 1074­18.odt prayed for extension of time.

2.

The time granted by the earlier order be extended by six months from today.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) V.B.Gokhale