The State Of Maharashtra v. Ravindra Uttam Kamble And ORS

ssm 1 16-als57.17.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 57 OF 2017 The State of Maharashtra .....Applicant Vs.

Ravindra Uttam Kamble & Ors.

....Respondents.

Ms. M.M. Deshmukh, APP for the Applicant­State. None for the Respondents.

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND A. S. GADKARI, JJ.

DATE : 22nd OCTOBER, 2018.

P.C.:­ Heard Ms. Deshmukh, the learned APP appearing for the Appliant­State.

Though the appearance of Mr. Ambulkar, the learned Advocate was shown for the Respondent No.1 when the Application for condonation of delay was considered, none appeared for the Respondents today.

With the assistance of the learned APP, we have carefully perused the notes of evidence and in particular, evidence of PW 3­Mr. Tanaji Trimbak Kamble.

Prima facie, the findings recorded by the Trial Court do not 1/2

ssm 2 16-als57.17.doc appear to be in consonance with the evidence on record so far the present Respondents are concerned. In that view of the matter, the case is established for allowing this Application for seeking leave to Appeal.

Application is allowed and the same is accordingly disposed off.

The action under Section 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to follow before the Sessions Court at Kolhapur. The Registry to register the Appeal.

(A.S. GADKARI, J.) (S.S. SHINDE,J.) 2/2